[CCWG-ACCT] SIDE BY SIDE on Regulation/Contract language

[Burr, Becky]

What about provided by parties under the Registrar Accreditation Agreement
(RAA) or the Registry Agreement (RA).


J. Beckwith Burr 
Neustar, Inc. / Deputy
General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington D.C. 20006
Office: +1.202.533.2932  Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 / neustar.biz
<http://www.neustar.biz>




On 11/17/15, 1:35 PM, "Mueller, Milton L" <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:

>I am fine with replacing "covered by" the RAA/RA with "provided by
>parties to" the RAA/RA  as Malcolm suggests below
>--MM
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> I'm afraid "covered by" is unacceptably broad; it could be read as
>>including
>> anything mentioned within those contracts, which woud enable those that
>> agree such contracts to defeat the previous clause.
>> 
>> I am not clear on the underlying rationale, but I am guessing that the
>>RA/RAA
>> contracts may impose requirements on the information services (e.g. web
>> sites) provided by Registries and Registrars, and so a carve-out is
>>needed so
>> that this may continue. If this understanding is correct, I would
>>suggest
>> 
>>        "other than information services provided by parties to
>>        the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) or the Registry
>>        Agreement (RA)"
>> 
>> I hope that helps.
>> 
>_______________________________________________
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_
>listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=CwICAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lU
>Lrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=SgsFb5SKtIl0YbCsoOu4cu
>j3G_Kwu9p9vDxn2nn_My8&s=GllbyBFg63u0C4L_G2ONXvv4BGZsdpeGoqi1vcgh_zQ&e=