[CCWG-ACCT] Timeline and next steps (updated)

Thu Nov 19 15:29:58 UTC 2015

I support this request for a poll on the proposed timeline, as we may be losing touch with what members and are participants are saying in this working group.  It isn’t only the expected work on holidays, but also the pace at which people are expected to read and comment on this work that is impossible.  The unavailability of translations on this report until the very end of the public comment period is simply not acceptable as a method of operation.  We need a revised timeline in light of the many concerns expressed with the timeline proposed by the co-chairs.

Robin

> On Nov 19, 2015, at 7:13 AM, Schaefer, Brett <Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> I object to this timeline.
>  
> In the Adobe meeting earlier this week there was wide support for extending the comment period to 30 or 40 days. I suggest a CCWG poll on (1) maintaining the 21 day comment period ending on Dec 21, (2) extending it to 30 days ending on Dec 30, or (3) extending it to 40 days ending on Jan 9.
>  
> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>] On Behalf Of Seun Ojedeji
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 9:59 AM
> To: Accountability Cross Community
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Timeline and next steps (updated)
>  
> Hello,
> 
> I do have sympathy for US colleagues participating in this process. I just like to flag early that whatever approach is finally concluded (based on the concern raised by US participants) should be noted and applied for subsequent scenarios that may occur.
> 
> Regards
>  
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:20 PM, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx <mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>> wrote:
> An earlier version of this email was sent mistakenly so please disregard the earlier version and have this version as the final version.
>  
> =================
>  
>  
> Dear all,
>  
> As indicated on call #68, we have designed a detailed roadmap of key dates and milestones toward finalizing theThird Draft Proposal that we invite you to read and mark in your calendars. 
>  
> In order to meet our 30 November deadline, it will be important that we all comply with this calendar of deliverables to ensure feedback and edits are incorporated into the Third Proposal in a prompt and appropriate fashion:
>  
> 20-Nov-15
> Full Proposal content is delivered to CCWG by 23:59 UTC
> 21-23 Nov-15
> CCWG Co-Chairs and Rapporteurs gather feedback from Working Party groups, legal counsel and Advisors
> 23-Nov-15
> CCWG final comments on Full Proposal content due  by 23:59 UTC
> 24-Nov-15
> Weekly call #69
> 24-25-Nov 15
> Back and forth and finalizing content with Co-Chairs, Writing team holding the pen
> 25-Nov-15
> Content due to translation / formatting by 23:59 UTC
> 26-Nov-15
> Additional CCWG-ACCT call (call #70)
> 30-Nov-15
> Begin Phase 2 of Consideration by Chartering Organizations
> 30-Nov-15
> Begin professional proofreading/final editing
> 12 -Dec-15
> Translations ready 
> 20-Dec-15
> Delivery of final proofreading/editing
> 21-Dec-15
> End of public comment and first close for Chartering Organizations to indicate support for recommendations
> 24-Dec-15
> Staff summary of public comments and Chartering Organization support for recommendation
>  
> Please note that in consideration of the work load, we recommend holding an additional next week on Thursday  26 November at 14:00-16:00 UTC. For US-based colleagues, the timeslot was selected so that it is early in day for you in consideration of the U.S. holiday.  
>  
> We recognize that we are operating under tight deadlines to produce our Third Draft Proposal and as always, thank you for your cooperation and hard work.
>  
> Best regards
>  
> Mathieu, Thomas, León
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Brett Schaefer
> Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs
> Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy
> The Heritage Foundation
> 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
> Washington, DC 20002
> 202-608-6097
> heritage.org <http://heritage.org/>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Seun Ojedeji,
> Federal University Oye-Ekiti
> web:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng/>
> Mobile: +2348035233535
> alt email:  <http://goog_1872880453/>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng <mailto:seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>
> Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your action!
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151119/54e85961/attachment-0001.html>