[CCWG-ACCT] Board comments on the Mission statement)

[Paul Rosenzweig]

Yes but there have been many such examples already e.g. Melton 5 minutes ago.  We are already in the drafting.  So this seems a bit retrograde mo?
--
Paul
Sent from myMail app for Android Saturday, 21 November 2015, 05:13PM -06:00 from Bruce Tonkin < Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au> :

>Hello Paul,
>
>>>    I read the concerns about the restriction clause as suggesting that it be deleted (perhaps I am wrong in this) 
>
>No- we didn’t say that a restriction clause should be deleted. 
>
>We said:
>
>" The Board asks that the CCWG provide some examples of what the
>CCWG believes that ICANN should and should not be able to do.
>That information can then be provided to counsel to see if text can be
>drafted to address the broader concerns."
>
>
>Regards,
>Bruce Tonkin
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151122/4a66c505/attachment.html>