[CCWG-ACCT] Board comments on the Mission statement)

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

Just for the record, he is not an appointed member, only a participant, so he is not entitled to a minority opinion in case there is less than full consensus among the members.

el

-- 
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini

> On 23 Nov 2015, at 00:17, Paul Rosenzweig <paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com> wrote:
> 
> Sorry Greg.  We had that consensus earlier.   Your representation of your constituency doesn't change that.  If we reach a new consensus that's great.  If not however your minority dissent doesn't change the historical facts.
> 
> Paul
> 
> --
> Paul
> Sent from myMail app for Android
> 
> Sunday, 22 November 2015, 05:12PM -05:00 from Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 9:02 AM, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net> wrote:
> 
> If we can’t come to agreement on alternative wording then we have to default back to the existing text that was in the 2nd draft report.
> 
> ​GS: I disagree with this statement.  I think the recent discussions have shown substantial ambiguities and areas of dispute around the meaning, scope, explanation, and interpretation​ ​of the text in the second draft report.
> 
> Furthermore, we have moved beyond the second draft language in our deliberations.  I think that some of the changes to the second draft language have had fairly broad support and there is no reason to throw those advances out.
> 
> At the very least, I think we would need an explicit call for consensus to determine the current level of support for the second draft language.
> 
> Even if we want to consider reverting back to the second draft language, there's no reason to say that we have to do so.
> 
> Greg
> 
> 
> 
> -jg
> 
> From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
> Date: Sunday 22 November 2015 at 1:55 p.m.
> To: Paul Rosenzweig <paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com>
> Cc: "accountability-cross-community at icann.org" <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Board comments on the Mission statement)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> A lot has been said, there has been examples and counter examples as well. Could you share at least one example that has survived being countered and most importantly a mission wording that will adequately address that example.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
> 
> On 22 Nov 2015 00:42, "Paul Rosenzweig" <paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com> wrote:
> Yes but there have been many such examples already e.g. Melton 5 minutes ago.  We are already in the drafting.  So this seems a bit retrograde mo?
> 
> --
> Paul
> Sent from myMail app for Android
> 
> Saturday, 21 November 2015, 05:13PM -06:00 from Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>:
> 
> Hello Paul,
> 
> >>   I read the concerns about the restriction clause as suggesting that it be deleted (perhaps I am wrong in this) 
> 
> No- we didn’t say that a restriction clause should be deleted. 
> 
> We said:
> 
> " The Board asks that the CCWG provide some examples of what the
> CCWG believes that ICANN should and should not be able to do.
> That information can then be provided to counsel to see if text can be
> drafted to address the broader concerns."
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151123/4deec6b9/attachment-0001.html>