[CCWG-ACCT] TR: ST18 subgroup report Nov 23

[Arun Mohan Sukumar]

The compromise proposal offered by the co-chairs today in the ST18 call strikes me as sound, and definitely a step in the right direction. 

The interaction between GAC and Board members when responding to "advice that has broad support and no significant objection", however, must be transparent. I hope transparency language will be introduced to qualify this provision.

Arun


Sent from my iPhone

> On 23-Nov-2015, at 11:12 PM, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr> wrote:
> 
> Dear Colleagues,
>  
> Please find attached a report from the ST18 subgroup, for discussion during the CCWG call in about 12 hours. This is a co-chair summary, with options about which we will discuss in order to define our group’s way forward for the Draft Report.
>  
> I want to express my warmest appreciation and thanks to all the ST18 subgroup colleagues who participated with great interest to our work, and especially to the colleagues who provided constructive inputs to these discussions.
>  
> Best
> Mathieu
>  
> De : Mathieu Weill [mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr] 
> Envoyé : lundi 23 novembre 2015 18:39
> À : s18 at icann.org
> Objet : ST18 subgroup report Nov 23
>  
> Dear Colleagues,
>  
> Please find attached the (very summarized) report of our work that will be presented tomorrow in the CCWG. It will be circulated momentarily to the full group.
>  
> Thanks again for all the constructive and valuable inputs you have provided to advance this key item of our work.
>  
> Best,
> Mathieu
> <ST18 subgroup report Nov 23.pptx>
> <ST18 subgroup report Nov 23.pdf>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151123/4bc64c00/attachment.html>