[CCWG-ACCT] Notes-Recordings-Transcript links for WP1 Meeting | 22 November

[Jordan Carter]

hi Greg,

Yes, that's the idea...

best
Jordan


On 23 November 2015 at 08:49, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry I was unable to make the WP-1 call today.  Can someone clarify what
> this means?
>
> ACTION ITEM: CoChairs to request that SO/AC confirmation of participation
> be sent along with input on third draft proposal
>
> Does this mean that the SO/ACs will be asked to confirm that they will
> participate in the Sole Designator/Empowered Community?  And that this
> confirmation is being requested with the input expected on or around
> December 21, 2015?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Greg
>
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer at icann.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>>
>>
>> The notes, recordings and transcripts for the WP-1 meeting on 22 November
>> will be available here:  https://community.icann.org/x/XMJYAw
>>
>>
>>
>> A copy of the notes and action items may be found below.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Brenda
>>
>>
>> Action Item
>>
>> ·
>> *ACTION ITEM: CoChairs to request that SO/AC confirmation of participation be sent along with input on third draft proposal*
>>
>> ·        *ACTION ITEM: Determine where full IRP process should be added *
>> *Notes*
>>
>>
>> *These high-level notes are designed to help you navigate through content of the call and do not substitute in any way the transcript.*
>>
>> LInk to docs:  https://community.icann.org/x/eLRYAw
>>
>>
>> - No discussion of decision threshold in engagement/escalation - it needs to be added to the powers
>>
>> - IANA Functions review language should be further elaborated.
>>
>> - IRP, separation processes need to be described in detail
>>
>> ACTION ITEM: Determine where full IRP process should be added
>>
>> - Rights of inspection: there is a generic reference - its needs to be made explicit that rights of inspection
>> equivalent to member's
>>
>> DIDP should be subject to IRP - this is unclear in WS2
>>
>> DIDP appeals mechanisms
>>
>> - Human Rights - add 'if any' in human rights appendix
>>
>> - Ombudsman improvements missing from WS2
>>
>> - Add table of required threshold to core proposal
>>
>> - Consider reordering sections (staff to refer to Jordan's request)
>>
>>
>> -Articles should be subject to co-decision but lower threshold than Fundamental Bylaws
>>
>>
>> Protection should be offered to Articles of Incorporation at level of membership model
>>
>> Other views that should be on same protection as Fundamental Bylaw
>>
>> - Reinsert AOC tables into annex 9
>>
>>
>> ACTION ITEM: CoChairs to request that SO/AC confirmation of participation be sent along with input on third draft proposal
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>


-- 
Jordan Carter

Chief Executive
*InternetNZ*

+64-4-495-2118 (office) | +64-21-442-649 (mob)
Email: jordan at internetnz.net.nz
Skype: jordancarter
Web: www.internetnz.nz

*A better world through a better Internet *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151124/0c01d5d5/attachment.html>