[CCWG-ACCT] [WP2] WP2 Issues with third draft

[Greg Shatan]

I would support this as well, for all the reasons stated.

Greg

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net> wrote:

>
>
> On 23/11/2015 23:14, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> > MISSION, CORE VALUES
> >
> > Page 33: In the infamous "ICANN shall have no powers" section (those
> > words since removed), I have been assured that there will be
> > instructions to the lawyers so that the final crafted Bylaw will make it
> > clear that for the purposes of this section, the identifiers themselves
> > will be deemed not to be content. A footnote in the Annex would give me
> > some comfort.
>
> As I have said before, I have no problem with doing this.
>
> In fact, please can we get on and do it, so we don't have to keep
> hearing this request repeated!
>
> --
>             Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
>    Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
>  London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/
>
>                  London Internet Exchange Ltd
>        Monument Place, 24 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AJ
>
>          Company Registered in England No. 3137929
>        Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WP2 mailing list
> WP2 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp2
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151123/13a385f3/attachment-0001.html>