[CCWG-ACCT] TR: ST18 subgroup report Nov 23

Greg Shatan gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Tue Nov 24 04:37:15 UTC 2015


I believe this proposal is also consistent with the Board's comments, just
transmitted by Bruce Tonkin.  Another reason to include it.​

Greg

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Phil Corwin <psc at vlaw-dc.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
> Virtualaw LLC
> 1155 F Street, NW
> Suite 1050
> Washington, DC 20004
> 202-559-8597/Direct
> 202-559-8750/Fax
> 202-255-6172/Cell
>
> Twitter: @VLawDC
>
> "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Nov 23, 2015, at 11:08 PM, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:
>
> This proposal has substantial support and must be included in the report.
>
> Milton L Mueller
> Professor, School of Public Policy
> Georgia Institute of Technology
>
> On Nov 23, 2015, at 18:29, Paul Rosenzweig <
> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> I’m sorry to object again Mathieu, but your report left out a proposal
> that, by my count, was supported by nearly a dozen different members of the
> ST18 working group.  I am not at all sure why the summary does not include
> it.  It took many forms, but here is my own version of it:
>
>
>
> The advice of the Governmental Advisory Committee on public policy matters
> shall be duly taken into account, both in the formulation and adoption of
> policies.
>
> In the event that the ICANN Board determines to take an action that is not
> consistent with the Governmental Advisory Committee advice, it shall so
> inform the Committee and state the reasons why it decided not to follow
> that advice.
>
>
>
> Any GAC advice approved by *a full GAC consensus, understood to mean the
> practice of adopting decisions by general agreement in the absence of any
> formal objection, may only be rejected by a vote of two-thirds (2/3) of the
> Board. *
>
>
>
> *With respect to such advice*, the Governmental Advisory Committee and
> the ICANN Board will try, in good faith and in a timely and efficient
> manner, to find a mutually acceptable solution.
>
>
>
> I would respectfully, but firmly, object to the exclusion of a proposal
> that has the support of a large number of participants and members  – I
> think there are at least three proposals to consider.  And indeed, a fourth
> (no change from Draft Report #2) is also plausible.
>
>
>
> Best
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>
> Paul Rosenzweig
>
> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
> <paul.rosenzweigesq at redbranchconsulting.com>
>
> O: +1 (202) 547-0660
>
> M: +1 (202) 329-9650
>
> VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
>
> Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
>
> Link to my PGP Key
> <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19&Itemid=9>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Mathieu Weill [mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
> <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>]
> *Sent:* Monday, November 23, 2015 12:42 PM
> *To:* Accountability Cross Community <
> accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> *Subject:* [CCWG-ACCT] TR: ST18 subgroup report Nov 23
>
>
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
>
>
> Please find attached a report from the ST18 subgroup, for discussion
> during the CCWG call in about 12 hours. This is a co-chair summary, with
> options about which we will discuss in order to define our group’s way
> forward for the Draft Report.
>
>
>
> I want to express my warmest appreciation and thanks to all the ST18
> subgroup colleagues who participated with great interest to our work, and
> especially to the colleagues who provided constructive inputs to these
> discussions.
>
>
>
> Best
>
> Mathieu
>
>
>
> *De :* Mathieu Weill [mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
> <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>]
> *Envoyé :* lundi 23 novembre 2015 18:39
> *À :* s18 at icann.org
> *Objet :* ST18 subgroup report Nov 23
>
>
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
>
>
> Please find attached the (very summarized) report of our work that will be
> presented tomorrow in the CCWG. It will be circulated momentarily to the
> full group.
>
>
>
> Thanks again for all the constructive and valuable inputs you have
> provided to advance this key item of our work.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Mathieu
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151123/1313058f/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list