[CCWG-ACCT] Update on Board discussions on the CCWG Update

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

I will take any opportunity I get to DISAGREE with Herrn Professor Dr
Mueller.

I AGREE with Herrn Professor Dr Mueller.

el

On 2015-11-24 08:13, Greg Shatan wrote:
> I will take any opportunity I get to agree with Milton.  I agree with
> Milton.
> 
> Greg
> 
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Phil Corwin <psc at vlaw-dc.com
> <mailto:psc at vlaw-dc.com>> wrote:
> 
>     +1 on inspection rights.
> 
>     Without adequate transparency there can be no meaningful accountability.
> 
>     Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
>     Virtualaw LLC
>     1155 F Street, NW
>     Suite 1050
>     Washington, DC 20004
>     202-559-8597 <tel:202-559-8597>/Direct
>     202-559-8750 <tel:202-559-8750>/Fax
>     202-255-6172 <tel:202-255-6172>/cell
> 
>     Twitter: @VlawDC
>      
>     "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
> 
> 
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>     <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>
>     [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>     <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>] On Behalf
>     Of Mueller, Milton L
>     Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 12:08 AM
>     To: Bruce Tonkin; Accountability Cross Community
>     Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Update on Board discussions on the CCWG Update
> 
>     Bruce:
>     Happy to see that the board comment that "Care should be taken not
>     to introduce language into the Bylaws that reduces that clarity
>     [about what constitutes GAC 'advice'] and returns the Board to a
>     position of having to negotiate among various positions in its
>     consultation processes."
> 
>     >
>     > .     Inspection Rights and Transparency (page 12)
>     >
>     > The Board remains concerned about the insertion of inspection rights
>     > premised on the fact that they would have been available under a
>     > member structure.  The Board has already agreed that the issues of
>     > transparency,
> 
>     I am surprised by the resistance we are seeing to what I thought was
>     a fairly clear bargain: in exchange for yielding on membership,
>     which included inspection rights, the CCWG expected stronger
>     transparency and inspection rights in the Sole Designator model. As
>     has been noted many times in our deliberations, SD relies heavily,
>     if not near-exclusively, on the threat of board member removal, and
>     it would be impossible to have the information needed to utilize
>     that enforcement power without enhanced transparency and inspection
>     rights. Those enhancements are not going to come from vague promises
>     to "review" the DIDP in WS2 or from additional information about the
>     finances.  I would caution the board not to attempt to evade this
>     point by calling for additional specifications of " what sort of
>     information is expected to be requested, for what purpose and by
>     whom," as those things be specified in advance.
> 
>     > .     Removal of the Board (individual/entire) (pages 21-23)
>     >
>     > The Board believes that the rationale for the removal of the entire
>     > board or an individual Board member must be clearly set out, for
>     > example, through reference to a cause for removal that could be
>     set out in a pre-service letter.
> 
>     This approach was considered and rejected by the CCWG.
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>     Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>     <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>     _______________________________________________
>     Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>     Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>     <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> 

-- 
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421             \     /
Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/