[CCWG-ACCT] What happened to the "Principles" section of the Second Draft?

Mathieu Weill mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
Tue Nov 24 14:47:34 UTC 2015


Thank you Steve,



I agree these principles need to be reflected.



De : Steve DelBianco [mailto:sdelbianco at netchoice.org]
Envoyé : mardi 24 novembre 2015 15:34
À : Mathieu Weill; Greg Shatan; accountability-cross-community at icann.org
Objet : Re: [CCWG-ACCT] What happened to the "Principles" section of the 
Second Draft?



One principle that Greg and I brought up regards Advisory Committee formal 
advice:

1.	Advice should be clear as to whether the advice is supporting or opposing 
a proposed policy or action.
2.	Advice should include a rationale for the decision

This could go in the Bylaws Article XI, section 1, applying to all Advisory 
Committees.



From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of 
Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>
Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 at 8:51 AM
To: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>, 
"accountability-cross-community at icann.org" 
<accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] What happened to the "Principles" section of the 
Second Draft?



Dear Greg,



I noticed your comment, and your concern and compared versions.



It seems to me that the Principles section of the 2nd draft is appropriately 
captured in Recommendation #5 in the summary, as well as in annex 5. Some is 
also captured in the Human rights section of course.



Could you elaborate about the specific elements of the 2nd report that you 
are missing ?



Best

Mathieu



De : accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org 
[mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] De la part de Greg 
Shatan
Envoyé : lundi 23 novembre 2015 16:33
À : accountability-cross-community at icann.org
Objet : [CCWG-ACCT] What happened to the "Principles" section of the Second 
Draft?



In reviewing the Third Draft, the "Principles" section of the Second Draft 
seems to have disappeared entirely.  This section contained a number of 
important parts of our  proposal, and is an integral part of the overall 
proposal.



I anticipate a response that these recommendations have somehow been 
parceled out and absorbed into other sections of the Third Draft, but even a 
spot-check show that this is clearly not the case.



It appears that our quest for readability has resulted in significant and 
difficult to find changes to the substance of our proposals.  This 
undermines the proposal as a whole and makes the job of reviewing this draft 
much harder.



I am deeply concerned.



Greg



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151124/9e097179/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list