[CCWG-ACCT] Minority statements inclusion in report

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

So now a participant, from ALAC, which changes his mind for him as the wind blows, wants to change the charter after the fact. 

The charter could not be clearer on this.

I support Robin Gross's objection, endorse her minority opinion, object myself and shall forward a minority opinion in due course.

And for the record I did not, do not and will not consult with the ccNSO on my position. I don't have to.

And, for the record, I did inform the chair of ccNSO Council earlier, in terms of the charter, about being marginalized. 

The substance of which seeming to be getting traction in the US Appeals Court case.

el


-- 
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini

> On 30 Nov 2015, at 06:51, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I believe this particular report is quite critical and minority statement should be treated with adequate clarity and care. It should be clear if minority statements are written on behalf of the originating chartering organisation (i.e whether the CO has been consulted before such submission is made). The charter was not clear about this but I believe this should be the ideal thing to do at this stage. If member are the ones allowed to write minority reports (although it's not explicitly stated in the charter) then such exercise should involve coordination with the originating chartering organisation. Or maybe a declaimer be added in minority annexes that the views are those of the author and not of the Chartering organisation.
> 
> There may also be possibility that some minority statements could be resolved or perhaps further discussed to provide further clarity that convinces the author not to proceed further, this would imply having them come in early enough before finalising the report.
> 
> Regards
> Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
> 
>> On 29 Nov 2015 22:30, "Thomas Rickert" <thomas at rickert.net> wrote:
>> Dear Robin,
>> as discussed during the last CCWG call, minority statements will be included in the report as appendices if and when they are received.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Thomas 
>> 
>> ---
>> rickert.net
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 29.11.2015 um 21:37 schrieb Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org>:
>>> 
>>> Dear Co-Chairs,
>>> 
>>> I have still not received a response to this request.  What is the process for submitting minority statements?  Please advise.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Robin
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 11, 2015, at 5:35 PM, Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Dear Co-Chairs,
>>>> 
>>>> Could you please advise on the proposed schedule and process for ensuring that minority statements will be included in the report [of the executive summary]?
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Robin
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151130/039e4073/attachment.html>