[CCWG-ACCT] [Acct-Legal] Lawyers' Meeting on Friday

[farzaneh badii]

Can I just clarify something here: asking for additional documents and
advice that Board has received which relate to CCWG work does not one bit
suggests that we are implying power grab. I find it quite outrageous that a
simple request for some information that may be or may not be available
leads to such wrong misinterpretation.

Bruce, Thank you. Your assurance that the documents will be provided to the
possible extent was what I needed. It's a part of informational justice.
And thank you for being so responsive throughout.


On 1 October 2015 at 10:18, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <
wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote:

> Seun:
> Overall I think we should recognise the process as a need for power
> Balance and not a power grab/shift
>
> Wolfgang:
> 1++
>
>


-- 
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151001/6ccad0d6/attachment.html>