[CCWG-ACCT] Lawyers' Meeting on Friday

[Seun Ojedeji]

While I wish Bruce wisdom in answering your question. I don't understand
how you conclude that it's erroneous. From my "very" little understanding
of law, there are more than one way to achieve a goal and none of them
lacks consequences (disadvantage).

We have requested CCWG legal to provide their view about board proposal, I
don't know what is more useful than that document produced(unless we don't
trust CCWG legal as well). I mean, how differently would we have responded
by seeing the notes other than the way we have to board's proposal

That said, this does not mean I am discouraging transparency but just to
indicate that our answer/solution to settle the current disagreement is
most likely not in those notes.

Regards
Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 1 Oct 2015 10:24, "Jordan Carter" <jordan at internetnz.net.nz> wrote:

Hi Bruce

What advice has Jones Day or ICANN's in house legal team given to the Board
- either directly or through management - or directly to management - that
has led to erroneous conclusions regarding whether or not the decisions to
exercise powers on the part of a member can be constrained or not?

Such erroneous conclusions were evident from the comments of some board
members in Los Angeles.

Can that advise or a summary of it be shared with the CCWG?

Thanks
Jordan


On Thursday, 1 October 2015, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>
wrote:

> Hello Farzaneh,
>
>
> >>   I understand that the Board has made the Jones Day impact assessment
> available. But in a note it states that it has had discussions with
> advisors and staff. I would also like to request for any document that the
> Board has received in its discussion with the advisors and staff and notes
> of the  deliberation of their meetings.
>
> Yes our intent is to make all documents available.   So far the only one
> that I am aware of is the Jones Day analysis that was published.
>
> We received verbal briefings form the Advisors to the CCWG (
> https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/Advisors) , and I
> understand these advisors also gave verbal briefings to the CCWG, as well
> as any written comments they have posted to the public comments forum.
>
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>


-- 
Jordan Carter
Chief Executive, InternetNZ

+64-21-442-649 | jordan at internetnz.net.nz

Sent on the run, apologies for brevity

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151001/effde5d1/attachment.html>