[CCWG-ACCT] FW: Continued Counsel Dialogue
Chris Disspain
ceo at auda.org.au
Fri Oct 2 10:57:26 UTC 2015
No Avri. At the end of the day it rests with the court as I believe is clear from the note from JD.
After a finding by an arbitration panel that a bylaw has been breached, it is a matter for the Board about how they remedy (as I believe is the case with the member model also) and that remedy is itself subject to a claim that it breaches a bylaw (if the community has consensus). If the Board refuses to abide by the ruling then a court can order them to do so.
Have I misunderstood the way the member model works. I believe Becky has said numerous times that the only finding could be that the relevant bylaw has been breached, NOT that the Board must take a specific action. Is that wrong?
Cheers,
Chris
> On 2 Oct 2015, at 20:46 , Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> That was one of my favorite lines as well.
>
> And is a key point. In the current model, and as far as I can tell in
> the MEM, at the end of the day, all always rests "within the Board's
> discretion."
>
> avri
>
>
> On 02-Oct-15 05:29, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>> I really LOVE this one:
>>
>> [...]
>> "the Board is required to remedy that violation, within the
>> Board’s discretion."
>> [...]
>>
>> (last line on Page 1)
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151002/9dfb938e/attachment.html>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list