[CCWG-ACCT] FW: Continued Counsel Dialogue

[Chris Disspain]

And, let me say again…the memo was sent to your lawyers, not to the Board.


Cheers,

Chris

> On 2 Oct 2015, at 21:00 , James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net> wrote:
> 
> Agreed Avri and that was chat promoted me to respond to be honest, I don’t feel that this kind of tone is helpful to the board members trying to understand our proposal.
> 
> -James
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 02/10/2015 11:53, "accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Avri Doria" <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on behalf of avri at acm.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On 02-Oct-15 06:10, James Gannon wrote:
>>> be unnecessarily aggressive and accusatory in its tone
>> 
>> We need to remember that this was the release of a document created for
>> the Board.  It was probably not written for our eyes. I am grateful we
>> were allow this peek behind the curtain.
>> 
>> What is interesting to me is the realization that if the Board is fed a
>> steady diet of such legal advice, it becomes easy to understand the hard
>> line positions they take.
>> 
>> avri
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151002/eba4c1f2/attachment.html>