[CCWG-ACCT] Continued Counsel Dialogue

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

Philip,

This is exactly why I would like to see, and have asked for, the notes/transcript from their meeting with our Counsel.

el

-- 
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini

> On 2 Oct 2015, at 20:37, Phil Corwin <psc at vlaw-dc.com> wrote:
> 
> I appreciate the spirit of transparency in which this memo was shared.
>  
> However, upon initial reading, and now re-reading, it is not at all the type of legal memo I expected, one citing statute and case law for its positions.
>  
> It is really more of a lobbying document, and if I received a document like this in a different context (e.g., in regard to an issue being considered by Congress) my presumption would be that the client had told its counsel that it was unwilling to negotiate on a matter and that they were therefore instructed to prepare the strongest possible memo justifying that intransigent position.
> 
[...]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151002/eacc96bc/attachment.html>