[CCWG-ACCT] Continued Counsel Dialogue
Dr Eberhard W Lisse
el at lisse.na
Fri Oct 2 18:56:06 UTC 2015
Philip,
This is exactly why I would like to see, and have asked for, the notes/transcript from their meeting with our Counsel.
el
--
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
> On 2 Oct 2015, at 20:37, Phil Corwin <psc at vlaw-dc.com> wrote:
>
> I appreciate the spirit of transparency in which this memo was shared.
>
> However, upon initial reading, and now re-reading, it is not at all the type of legal memo I expected, one citing statute and case law for its positions.
>
> It is really more of a lobbying document, and if I received a document like this in a different context (e.g., in regard to an issue being considered by Congress) my presumption would be that the client had told its counsel that it was unwilling to negotiate on a matter and that they were therefore instructed to prepare the strongest possible memo justifying that intransigent position.
>
[...]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151002/eacc96bc/attachment.html>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list