[CCWG-ACCT] RV: A way to avoid the 'The Single Member Can Do Anything!' problem
Bruce Tonkin
Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au
Sun Oct 4 21:18:35 UTC 2015
Hello Jordan,
>> I would not support making the Board a decision-maker in the exercise of powers that are about holding the Board to account.
Agreed.
>> - the co-decision model, however, is useful - we have already proposed it for the change process for Fundamental Bylaws. I'd be much happier to explore whether that could be usefully explored for other powers.
Agreed. I think you make a useful distinction. I support both the Board and the community having a say in changing bylaws.
For determining whether the Board has followed its bylaws – then an independent arbitration process of some form is appropriate.
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151004/1069b3ee/attachment.html>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list