[CCWG-ACCT] RV: A way to avoid the 'The Single Member Can Do Anything!' problem
Jordan Carter
jordan at internetnz.net.nz
Mon Oct 5 22:20:34 UTC 2015
On 6 October 2015 at 11:16, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 4 Oct 2015, at 22:18, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >> - the co-decision model, however, is useful - we have already
> proposed it for the change process for Fundamental Bylaws. I'd be much
> happier to explore whether that could be usefully explored for other powers.
>
>
>
> Agreed. I think you make a useful distinction. I support both the
> Board and the community having a say in changing bylaws.
>
>
> The Board has the exclusive power of initiation for changes to the bylaws.
> I'd say that counts as a pretty significant say.
>
>
>
And, at risk of sounding like a broken record, the CCWG has never
contemplated anything other than a joint say. The fact the CMSM approach
would see a member with the power at law to make unilateral changes is not
a power we have ever contemplated allowing to be exercised.
best
Jordan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151006/a36e0751/attachment.html>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list