[CCWG-ACCT] RV: A way to avoid the 'The Single Member Can Do Anything!' problem

[Bruce Tonkin]

Yep – sounds fair to me.


From: Malcolm Hutty [mailto:malcolm at linx.net]
Sent: Tuesday, 6 October 2015 9:16 AM
To: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>
Cc: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] RV: A way to avoid the 'The Single Member Can Do Anything!' problem



On 4 Oct 2015, at 22:18, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au<mailto:Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>> wrote:

>>  - the co-decision model, however, is useful - we have already proposed it for the change process for Fundamental Bylaws. I'd be much happier to explore whether that could be usefully explored for other powers.

Agreed.   I think you make a useful distinction.   I support both the Board and the community having a say in changing bylaws.

The Board has the exclusive power of initiation for changes to the bylaws. I'd say that counts as a pretty significant say.

Malcolm.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151006/92a3a8ad/attachment.html>