[CCWG-ACCT] Update from Brussels

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

Paul,

.AU resolves whether Chris is on the Board, whether the ccNSO
Council meets whether the GAC achieves Consensus on something, or
whether ALAC spills the Board.

In other words, the only ICANN issue of DIRECT concern to a ccTLD
Manager is a hostile redelegation, everything else is "interesting"
only.

I have never advocated disengagement by the way, ICANN must just
leave those ccTLD Managers alone who want it, especially those who
registered the ccTLD(s) before ICANN, in particular those before RFC
1591.

If you call that advocating for independence, sure.

Protocols and Addresses advocate too, don't they?

el



On 2015-10-09 10:13, Paul Szyndler wrote:
> Eberhard,
> 
> I appreciate the distinction you make.
> 
> But surely there must be at least one conceivable scenario where
> the interests of a ccTLD manager could be affected by the current
> proposals.  Is there not a limit to the disengagement and
> independence you advocate?
> 
> I respectfully acknowledge that you may respond in the
> affirmative, but feel that the potentially seismic changes we are
> currently deliberating are likely to be of interest and
> consequence to anyone that can even spell "DNS".
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Paul
> 
[...]

-- 
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421             \     /
Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/