[CCWG-ACCT] Blog post on the Accountability work headed to Dublin

[Paul Rosenzweig]

With respect Bruce, I share Anne's view that this is not accurate.  The Board chair has stated unequivocally that the Board will not submit a Membership based proposal.  That is contrary to the statement that the Board will submit any proposal it receives from the CCWG "as is."  That is categorically ruling out one type of "as is" proposal.

If you are seriously telling me that even after all this back and forth the Board actually would submit a "Membership only" based proposal to the NTIA then I would respectfully say that the Board has done a very poor job of communicating.

So ... answer this question please as directly as you are willing:  If, today, the CCWG having considered but declined to accept the Board's input were to submit a proposal based upon a Membership organization would the Board transmit it to the NTIA as the ICANN proposal?

Paul

Paul Rosenzweig
paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com 
O: +1 (202) 547-0660
M: +1 (202) 329-9650
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
Link to my PGP Key


-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Tonkin [mailto:Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au] 
Sent: Friday, October 9, 2015 10:03 PM
To: 'Accountability Cross Community' <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Blog post on the Accountability work headed to Dublin

Hello Paul,

Regarding:

  https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-3-2015-02-12-en  

The statement still holds.    

The Board has provided input on a draft document so far, and has stated all along that it would raise any concerns along the way and not wait for a final proposal to raise any concerns.  

Regards,
Bruce Tonkin


_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community