[CCWG-ACCT] Where do we stand? (Was Re: Blog post on the Accountability work headed to Dublin)

[Aarti Bhavana]

^ +1
Thanks for the question, Seun. This would be very helpful in preparation
for Dublin, and for an informed discussion there.

Warm regards,
Aarti


On 11 October 2015 at 00:23, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Co-Chairs,
>
> FWIW, I think at this point, it will be good to have an understanding of
> where we are heading from the Co-Chairs. In some discussions it seem we
> have understood and agreed that a model that implies a structural change is
> impractical during this transition phase hence the suggestion made by Steve.
>
> Yet in other discussions it seem we are going ahead with the structural
> change model irrespective of the concerns raised from parts of the
> community and board.
>
> In other to prepare towards Dublin and contribute in a meaningful way, I
> think a summary of where we are presently and what is expected to be
> achieved in Dublin will be helpful. I apologise if this has already been
> shared, and in that case a pointer will be appreciated.
>
> Regards
>
> Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
> On 10 Oct 2015 19:37, "Stephen Deerhake" <sdeerhake at nic.as> wrote:
>
>> Paul,
>>
>> Perhaps the Board chair is articulating a minority viewpoint?  Afterall,
>> the
>> Board will have to vote on the matter of sending/not sending the output of
>> the CCWG on to NTIA.
>>
>> Stephen Deerhake
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of
>> Paul
>> Rosenzweig
>> Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2015 6:05 AM
>> To: 'Bruce Tonkin' <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>; 'Accountability
>> Cross
>> Community' <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Blog post on the Accountability work headed to
>> Dublin
>>
>> With respect Bruce, I share Anne's view that this is not accurate.  The
>> Board chair has stated unequivocally that the Board will not submit a
>> Membership based proposal.  That is contrary to the statement that the
>> Board
>> will submit any proposal it receives from the CCWG "as is."  That is
>> categorically ruling out one type of "as is" proposal.
>>
>> If you are seriously telling me that even after all this back and forth
>> the
>> Board actually would submit a "Membership only" based proposal to the NTIA
>> then I would respectfully say that the Board has done a very poor job of
>> communicating.
>>
>> So ... answer this question please as directly as you are willing:  If,
>> today, the CCWG having considered but declined to accept the Board's input
>> were to submit a proposal based upon a Membership organization would the
>> Board transmit it to the NTIA as the ICANN proposal?
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> Paul Rosenzweig
>> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
>> O: +1 (202) 547-0660
>> M: +1 (202) 329-9650
>> VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
>> Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
>> Link to my PGP Key
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bruce Tonkin [mailto:Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au]
>> Sent: Friday, October 9, 2015 10:03 PM
>> To: 'Accountability Cross Community'
>> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Blog post on the Accountability work headed to
>> Dublin
>>
>> Hello Paul,
>>
>> Regarding:
>>
>>   https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-3-2015-02-12-en
>>
>> The statement still holds.
>>
>> The Board has provided input on a draft document so far, and has stated
>> all
>> along that it would raise any concerns along the way and not wait for a
>> final proposal to raise any concerns.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bruce Tonkin
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>


-- 


Aarti Bhavana | Research Fellow
Centre for Communication Governance | National Law University, Delhi |
Sector-14,
Dwarka, New Delhi - 110078 | Cell: (+91) 965-464-6846 | Fax: (+91)
11-280-34256 | www.ccgdelhi.org . www.ccgtlr.org <http://www.ccgdelhi.org/>
. www.nludelhi.ac.in | Twitter: @ccgdelhi <https://twitter.com/CCGDelhi> .
@aartibhavana  <https://twitter.com/aartibhavana>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151011/28d258dd/attachment.html>