[CCWG-ACCT] A plea for time

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Avri
I am not in favour of adversarial act.'if we do every thing on consensus basis,and achieve our objectives why we gigot with Board?
Kavouss
  

Sent from my iPhone

> On 11 Oct 2015, at 21:38, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 11-Oct-15 15:22, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>> Not sure I get why you awarded accolades to SM in this instance, Isn't
>> collaboration(doing things cooperatively) based on set of guidelines
>> possible in any model including SM?
> 
> Court is always there at the end of the day.  I just think that a model
> built on cooperation and consensus (a non voting SM) is less likely to
> end up in court than a model that starts with adversarial behavior -
> arbitration and mediation.
> 
> A well formed SM model builds on a combination, a hand-fasting, of the
> Board's fiduciary roles and responsibilities with the Community's roles
> and responsibility to represent the interests of the public as best they
> can though the bylaws processes and outreach. They both check each other
> and both can be appealed to the IRP when they go off the rails.
> 
> avri
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community