[CCWG-ACCT] A plea for time

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

I am in complete agreement.  I hope we can find solutions that make
adversarial interactions as improbable as possible.

avri


On 11-Oct-15 16:13, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> Avri
> I am not in favour of adversarial act.'if we do every thing on consensus basis,and achieve our objectives why we gigot with Board?
> Kavouss
>   
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 11 Oct 2015, at 21:38, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 11-Oct-15 15:22, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>>> Not sure I get why you awarded accolades to SM in this instance, Isn't
>>> collaboration(doing things cooperatively) based on set of guidelines
>>> possible in any model including SM?
>> Court is always there at the end of the day.  I just think that a model
>> built on cooperation and consensus (a non voting SM) is less likely to
>> end up in court than a model that starts with adversarial behavior -
>> arbitration and mediation.
>>
>> A well formed SM model builds on a combination, a hand-fasting, of the
>> Board's fiduciary roles and responsibilities with the Community's roles
>> and responsibility to represent the interests of the public as best they
>> can though the bylaws processes and outreach. They both check each other
>> and both can be appealed to the IRP when they go off the rails.
>>
>> avri
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus