[CCWG-ACCT] Blog post on the Accountability work headed to Dublin

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

Bruce,

thank you.


So, in other words the CCWG can write whatever report it gets
Consensus on (of its appointed members), do Public Consultations as
much as it wants, and send whatever final report it gets Consensus
on (of its appointed members) to the Board which will then send it
unmodified to the NTIA.


Which means, all this (rather expensive) nonsense in LA was
unnecessary.

Unless one views this from the Board's (tactical) perspective.

Interesting...

greetings, el

On 2015-10-12 11:37, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
> Hello Eberhard,
> 
> It is the Board position, unless we pass a resolution to change it.   
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org On Behalf Of Dr Eberhard W Lisse
> Sent: Monday, 12 October 2015 6:52 PM
> To: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> Cc: directors at omadhina.net
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Blog post on the Accountability work headed to Dublin
> 
> Bruce,
> 
> are you sharing your understanding or is this the Board's position?
> 
> greetings
> 
> On 2015-10-10 04:03, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
>> Hello Paul,
>>
>> Regarding:
>>
>>   https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-3-2015-02-12-en
>>
>> The statement still holds.    
>>
>> The Board has provided input on a draft document so far, and has 
>> stated all along that it would raise any concerns along the way and 
>> not wait for a final proposal to raise any concerns.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bruce Tonkin
[...]
-- 
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421             \     /
Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/