[CCWG-ACCT] Accountability work headed to Dublin - Fadi's October 11 e-mail to certain "Community Leaders"

Kieren McCarthy kieren at kierenmccarthy.com
Tue Oct 13 00:59:26 UTC 2015


Do the community leaders plan on telling the rest of the working group when
they receive such restricted-audience messages in future and what their
contents are?


Kieren

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Anne,
>
> It's my understanding that the document attached to Fadi's email is being
> substantially revised, so I'm not sure of the efficacy of reviewing a
> document that is in the process of becoming obsolete.
>
> The "Community Leaders" in this instance are the chairs of the
> SO/AC/SG/C/RALOs.
>
> Greg
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Mike.  Good question.
>>
>> Separately, I understand that Fadi has sent out something he calls a
>> “communications tool” to an e-mail l list of certain “Community Leaders”
>> with respect to what must be accomplished by the CCWG-ACCT in Dublin.  It
>> includes a revised version of the chart we were presented with in an
>> earlier call – showing a version of what line items in the CCWG-ACCT
>> process are agreed and what items are disagreed.  Fadi is seeking input on
>> the chart from those copied on the e-mail.
>>
>> My question would be – How were these “Community Leaders” selected to
>> receive Fadi’s e-mail?  In the interest of transparency, would the
>> Co-Chairs please forward Fadi’s Sunday October 11 e-mail  on this topic to
>> the entire CCWG – ACCT for its consideration?
>> Thank you,
>> Anne
>>
>>
>>
>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>> Of Counsel
>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
>> One South Church Avenue Suite 700
>> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
>> AAikman at lrrlaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
>> accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Chartier,
>> Mike S
>> Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2015 5:58 PM
>> To: Bruce Tonkin
>> Cc: Accountability Cross Community
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Blog post on the Accountability work headed to
>> Dublin
>>
>> How is this possibly clearer?
>>
>> Are you going to forward them promptly, or follow the Charter and the
>> Resolution of 10/16/14?
>>
>> Those are two different paths.
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Oct 10, 2015, at 7:03 PM, Bruce Tonkin <
>> Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello Paul,
>> >
>> > I will try to be clearer on the process for submission to the NTIA:
>> >
>> > From: https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/Charter
>> >
>> > "Submission Board Report
>> >
>> > After receiving the notifications from all chartering organizations as
>> described above, the Co-Chairs of the CCWG-Accountability shall, within 10
>> working days after receiving the last notification, submit to the Chair of
>> the ICANN Board of Directors and Chairs of all the chartering organizations
>> the CCWG-Accountability Board Report, which shall include at a minimum:
>> >
>> > a)     The (Supplemental) Proposal as adopted by the
>> CCWG-Accountability; and
>> >
>> > b)     The notifications of the decisions from the chartering
>> organizations
>> >
>> > c)     Documentation of the process that was followed, including, but
>> not limited to documenting the process of building consensus within the
>> CCWG-Accountability and public consultations."
>> >
>> >
>> > The Board will then meet to consider the CCWG-Accountability Board
>> Report, and decide what, if any, comments to submit with the report taking
>> into account (a), (b), and (c) above.
>> >
>> >
>> > From: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-3-2015-02-12-en
>> >
>> >
>> > "When ICANN receives these proposals, we will forward them promptly and
>> without modification to NTIA.  When ICANN receives these proposals, we will
>> forward them promptly and without modification to NTIA.  As we have
>> previously stated, if we do submit the proposals with an accompanying
>> communication of comments, they will be on points we had already shared
>> with the community during the development of the proposals. "
>> >
>> >
>> > The NTIA has its own decision processes with respect to their
>> stewardship of the IANA function.   I can’t comment on what their process
>> will be.
>> >
>> >
>> > Separately the Board will need to meet to consider the implementation
>> of recommendations from the CCWG to change the organization and bylaws.
>>  Bylaws changes are made when there is community support and when the Board
>> believes they are in the global public interest.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 16 October 2014, in Los Angeles, the Board set out its process for
>> considering the changes proposed in the CCWG-Accountability Board Report.
>> >
>> > The process was based on similar processes used to accept policy
>> recommendations from the supporting organizations (SOs) that exist in the
>> bylaws today.
>> >
>> > See agenda item 2(d):
>> > https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2014-10-16-
>> > en#2.d
>> >
>> > I hope that is clearer.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Bruce Tonkin
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> > Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151012/12aa9ac8/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list