[CCWG-ACCT] Dublin schedule changes and work plan

[Nigel Roberts]

Seun

Are you being serious?

I have ccNSO Council pre-meetings on Sunday, TechDay Monday, and the 
whole two days of ccNSO on Tuesday and Wednesday, culminating in the 
Council meeting.

I am told that some anonumous "leaders" have -- at the very last minute 
- made such major changes as to make my further participation almost 
impossible (since I would be so behind the curve after missing four days 
worth of "work".).

The "getting on a plane" comment is simple -- people are now starting to 
be in transit for ICANN. Travel arrangements have already been made and 
may be unchangeable for some.

This is downright disrespectful.

On 13/10/15 11:02, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
> For some of us, flying is not the important part of an ICANN Meeting.
>
> el
>
> On 2015-10-13 11:55, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>> Hello People,
>>
>> There is no violation of process here, lets be realistic, its
>> important to interact with the community as much as possible in
>> Dublin and if the Co-Chairs have been able to get some more time
>> slots through their interactions with the rightful owners of the
>> spaces (SO/AC leaders), I think it should be a good news for us.
>> Noting in the normal agenda of the CCWG has changed, in that the
>> long f2f meeting still holds on Friday and the other slots does
>> not extend beyond the normal ICANN meeting days so i don't see how
>> that affects anyone getting on plane.
>>
>> I don't think its within the CCWG's charter to secure normal SO/AC
>> time-slots without consulting with them first.  Now that the
>> consultation has happened its left to this group to decide whether
>> they don't want it or not.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net
>> <mailto:nigel at channelisles.net>> wrote:
>>
>>      Colleagues
>>
>>      I strongly object to this behind-the-scenes way of working.
>>
>>      Can you please list (a) the "AC/SO leaders" and the powers
>>      they have in the Charter to do this.
>>
>>      This appears to be to be DELIBERATELY exclusionary.  Many of
>>      us participatns have already got committments for most of this
>>      five day long meeting.
>>
>>      It is ENTIRELY UNACCEPTABLE to make such a decision as people
>>      are already getting on aeroplanes.
>>
>>      I wish to invoke the Reconsideration procedure, please.
>>
>>
> [...]
>