[CCWG-ACCT] Dublin schedule changes and work plan

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

I am not speculating about HOW it happened.

The issue is what happened and perhaps why.  And at least for the
latter the how becomes "interesting".

At the moment it looks like we were told, today, that we'll be
having us a 5-Day CCWG meeting clashing with mainly everything, in
particular Transition related activities of at least the ccNSO, ie
it's Plan-D :-)-O

Hence, and because I can't post the ccNSO Council, I'll cc the
lists.

greetings, el


On 2015-10-13 16:01, Greg Shatan wrote:
> ​The speculation in this thread about how this decision was
> arrived at is incorrect.
> 
> ICANN developed a plan with 3 options (A = no disruption, B =
> moderate disruption, C = significant disruption) for changing the
> ICANN54 schedule to add more time for Accountability-related
> meetings.  This was not requested (as far as I know) by the CCWG
> Co-Chairs and certainly not by the AC/SO leaders.  As far as I
> know, the impetus for this came from within ICANN. (The AC/SO
> leaders are the Chairs of each AC, SO, Stakeholder Group,
> Constituency and RALO.)​ The Chairs were given several days in
> which to confer with the stakeholders they represent in order to
> assess which option(s) they might find acceptable.
> 
> After that, the call Mathieu mentioned took place.  In addition to
> AC/SO/SG/C/RALO Chairs, the call included the co-chairs of the
> CCWG, CWG and ICG and members of ICANN staff.
> 
> Greg
> 
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.na
> <mailto:el at lisse.na>> wrote:
> 
>     Well,
> 
>     I am an Observer to the ccNSO's Program Comittee.  As such, I
>     have indeed observed that Transition related activities take
>     up a significant amount of the time of the two days of the
>     ccNSO meeting.
> 
>     So James' statement, below, when read in itself, without
>     context, is not false.
> 
>     But, it has nothing to do with springing today's surprise
>     which would, in fact, make it worse, because these related
>     events clashing.
> 
> 
>     greetings, el
> 
> 
>     On 2015-10-13 12:45, James Gannon wrote:
>     > I’m not Mathieu but I know that the ACSO leadership were
>     > involved as changing the ICNN54 schedule to have a greater
>     > focus on CCWG activities required a change in the scheduled
>     > events for each of the Acs and Sos, so there will be items
>     > removed from the current schedule in order to free up spaces
>     > for the CCWG to be attended by members and participants from
>     > the various parts of the community.
>     >
>     > -jg
[...]
-- 
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421             \     /
Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/