[CCWG-ACCT] A Contract Solution?

[Rubens Kuhl]

> On Oct 13, 2015, at 9:08 PM, Paul Rosenzweig <paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com> wrote:
> 
> Colleagues
>  
> David Post, who is listed as an “observer” of this group (he says incorrectly – that he is a participant) asked me to post the following message on his behalf suggesting an alternate way of going forward.  I am not sure what I think of his idea, but I imagine it might be useful to some. 
>  

Aother non-participant (John Levine) have posted an opinion as well:
http://www.circleid.com/posts/20151010_an_alternative_to_ccwg_overreach/ <http://www.circleid.com/posts/20151010_an_alternative_to_ccwg_overreach/>

His SOI from 2011 seems to be current AFAIK:

http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/hstld-ag/2011-February/000874.html <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/hstld-ag/2011-February/000874.html>
http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/hstld-ag/2010-January/000060.html <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/hstld-ag/2010-January/000060.html>

Please don't shoot the messenger because as Greg Shatan (a participant in this group) already pointed out in comments to the original message I don't think this would be possible at this time without revisiting many months of consensus building... 



Rubens



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151013/f7d39f1e/attachment.html>