[CCWG-ACCT] Scorecard for Dublin

Bruce Tonkin Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au
Wed Oct 14 02:18:11 UTC 2015


Thanks Thomas, very helpful.

Is it possible to get a definition of the meaning of the status  "to be considered" and "to be refined".

I am guessing that a rough match to the Board's terminology is that a "to be considered' is a 1B and "to be refined" is a 1A - but just want to check.

Thanks,
Bruce Tonkin


From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Rickert
Sent: Tuesday, 13 October 2015 10:48 PM
To: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Scorecard for Dublin

All,
Mathieu has kindly updated a Google doc he had prepared some time ago.

It is a scorecard displaying the various areas of work and their respective completion status.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HcUUDn5DHSVo7lLo-FWU_QMa8PGgfZWTP_kGo1EXNQs/edit?usp=sharing

There's a lot of yellow "to be refined" which we should be able to turn into green in Dublin.

Kind regards,
Thomas



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151014/cf3cd165/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list