[CCWG-ACCT] Scorecard for Dublin
Bruce Tonkin
Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au
Wed Oct 14 02:18:11 UTC 2015
Thanks Thomas, very helpful.
Is it possible to get a definition of the meaning of the status "to be considered" and "to be refined".
I am guessing that a rough match to the Board's terminology is that a "to be considered' is a 1B and "to be refined" is a 1A - but just want to check.
Thanks,
Bruce Tonkin
From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Rickert
Sent: Tuesday, 13 October 2015 10:48 PM
To: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Scorecard for Dublin
All,
Mathieu has kindly updated a Google doc he had prepared some time ago.
It is a scorecard displaying the various areas of work and their respective completion status.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HcUUDn5DHSVo7lLo-FWU_QMa8PGgfZWTP_kGo1EXNQs/edit?usp=sharing
There's a lot of yellow "to be refined" which we should be able to turn into green in Dublin.
Kind regards,
Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151014/cf3cd165/attachment.html>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list