[CCWG-ACCT] Scorecard for Dublin

[Thomas Rickert]

Thanks, Bruce!

For the areas that need to be refined: These are areas where the group has already seen proposals, which just need some tweaking.

For the areas that need to be considered: These would be parts where the group has not seen draft language at all, e.g. on human rights.

Best,
Thomas

> Am 14.10.2015 um 04:18 schrieb Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>:
> 
> Thanks Thomas, very helpful.
> 
> Is it possible to get a definition of the meaning of the status  “to be considered” and “to be refined”.
> 
> I am guessing that a rough match to the Board’s terminology is that a “to be considered’ is a 1B and “to be refined” is a 1A – but just want to check.
> 
> Thanks,
> Bruce Tonkin
> 
>   <>
> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Rickert
> Sent: Tuesday, 13 October 2015 10:48 PM
> To: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Scorecard for Dublin
> 
> All,
> Mathieu has kindly updated a Google doc he had prepared some time ago.
> 
> It is a scorecard displaying the various areas of work and their respective completion status.
> 
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HcUUDn5DHSVo7lLo-FWU_QMa8PGgfZWTP_kGo1EXNQs/edit?usp=sharing <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HcUUDn5DHSVo7lLo-FWU_QMa8PGgfZWTP_kGo1EXNQs/edit?usp=sharing>
> 
> There's a lot of yellow "to be refined" which we should be able to turn into green in Dublin.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Thomas
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151014/e27ee991/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151014/e27ee991/signature.asc>