[CCWG-ACCT] ALAC Position on Membership

Drazek, Keith kdrazek at verisign.com
Sun Oct 18 12:46:13 UTC 2015


I agree an explanation would be helpful. Particularly around the choice of timing. 

Keith

> On Oct 18, 2015, at 1:43 PM, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Given the announcement a few moments ago that the ALAC has voted to no longer support the reference model as presented in the second draft, for those of us who were not able to be in the room I think it would be great if some of our ALAC participants could give a brief overview of the reason for this change and give us some context for this vote taken by the ALAC just so we are fully informed and up to speed.
> 
> I don’t want to start a debate but merely would like to be better informed as to the reasoning and background.
> 
> -James Gannon
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> 
> 



More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list