[CCWG-ACCT] ALAC Position on Membership

[Alan Greenberg]

I was composing such a statement and had not been aware of any 
statement. After seeing this, I was made aware of a tweet that I 
presume is the aforementioned announcement.

I will be sending out a formal statement shortly.

Alan

At 18/10/2015 08:46 AM, Drazek, Keith wrote:
>I agree an explanation would be helpful. Particularly around the 
>choice of timing.
>
>Keith
>
> > On Oct 18, 2015, at 1:43 PM, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Given the announcement a few moments ago that the ALAC has voted 
> to no longer support the reference model as presented in the second 
> draft, for those of us who were not able to be in the room I think 
> it would be great if some of our ALAC participants could give a 
> brief overview of the reason for this change and give us some 
> context for this vote taken by the ALAC just so we are fully 
> informed and up to speed.
> >
> > I don't want to start a debate but merely would like to be better 
> informed as to the reasoning and background.
> >
> > -James Gannon
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> > Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> >
> >
>_______________________________________________
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community