[CCWG-ACCT] ALAC Position on Membership

Padmini pdmnbaruah at gmail.com
Sun Oct 18 13:34:40 UTC 2015


It would also be great if there was some clarity on how ALAC proposes to
deal with the enforceability problem without the legal personhood that
forms the basis of the sole member model.
On 18 Oct 2015 18:56, "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek at verisign.com> wrote:

> The "Reference Model" is the Sole Member model included in our last report.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Oct 18, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Phil Corwin <psc at vlaw-dc.com> wrote:
> >
> > Point of information:
> > I know what the member and designator‎ models are - but what is the
> reference model?
> >
> >
> > Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
> >
> > Virtualaw LLC
> >
> > 1155 F Street, NW
> >
> > Suite 1050
> >
> > Washington, DC 20004
> >
> > 202-559-8597/Direct
> >
> > 202-559-8750/Fax
> >
> > 202-255-6172/cell
> >
> >
> >
> > "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [
> accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] on behalf of Drazek,
> Keith [kdrazek at verisign.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 8:46 AM
> > To: James Gannon
> > Cc: Accountability Cross Community
> > Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] ALAC Position on Membership
> >
> > I agree an explanation would be helpful. Particularly around the choice
> of timing.
> >
> > Keith
> >
> >> On Oct 18, 2015, at 1:43 PM, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> Given the announcement a few moments ago that the ALAC has voted to no
> longer support the reference model as presented in the second draft, for
> those of us who were not able to be in the room I think it would be great
> if some of our ALAC participants could give a brief overview of the reason
> for this change and give us some context for this vote taken by the ALAC
> just so we are fully informed and up to speed.
> >>
> >> I don’t want to start a debate but merely would like to be better
> informed as to the reasoning and background.
> >>
> >> -James Gannon
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> >> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> > _______________________________________________
> > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> > Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151018/02606aa7/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list