[CCWG-ACCT] Meeting with the Icann Board

[Alan Greenberg]

My recollection is that our last action was to task the Saturday 
breakout groups with looking at specific issues such as decision 
making or board member removal, as they would apply to both the 
Community Mechanism as a Sole Member and the Community Mechanism as a 
Sole Designator.

Alan

At 18/10/2015 06:16 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>But can someone confirm that the CCWG Accountability is proposing 
>Designator or Sole Designator?
>
>My understanding is that it does not.
>
>el
>
>--
>Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
>
> > On 18 Oct 2015, at 23:05, Bruce Tonkin 
> <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> >
> >>> We understand that Bruce Tonkin, in his Liaison capacity, will 
> be in a position to provide an update of the Board's views on 
> Monday during our session.
> >
> > I can confirm that during this meeting, we informed the co-chairs 
> that I would make a statement on Monday, and that considering the 
> progress made on other areas, the Board was prepared to consider 
> the Designator or Sole Designator models as outlined during the 
> Friday and Saturday CCWG sessions.
> >
> > See you all tomorrow.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bruce Tonkin
> >
> > ICANN Board liaison to the CCWG
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> > Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>_______________________________________________
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community