[CCWG-ACCT] individual SO/AC elected Board member removal

[Rubens Kuhl]

In case of NomCom-appointed Board Members, would the relevant SO/AC be NomCom or would this mechanism not be available ? 


Rubens



> On Oct 19, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Chris Disspain <ceo at auda.org.au <mailto:ceo at auda.org.au>> wrote:
> 
> Here’s what the breakout group reached consensus on.
> 
> A petition for removal would arise in the relevant SO/AC
> 
> The SO/AC would organise a briefing call to establish whether there is sufficient  support within the SO/AC to move to the next step. A clear reasoning/rationale must be provided and the Director given a chance to respond. Sufficient support threshold is simple majority. This call should be open to all to attend but is a discussion of the SO/AC.
> 
> If there is a simple majority to proceed then the SO/AC would convene a Community Forum for the discussion to proceed. The forum can be light weight and very possibly not face to face. It is open to all. A clear reasoning/rationale must be provided and the Director given a chance to respond.
> 
> Immediately after the Community Forum, the relevant SO/AC sends every other SO/AC a request for comment on the removal. 
> 
> The other SO/ACs provide written comments.
> 
> The relevant SO/AC then makes a decision. Removal of the Director requires a 75% majority in the relevant SO/AC.
> 
> The relevant SO/AC must publish the results and an explanation if the Director is removed.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Chris
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151019/a5708855/attachment.html>