[CCWG-ACCT] individual SO/AC elected Board member removal

[Nigel Roberts]

+1 to this.

Subsidarity, please,. Each SO should decide how to remove it own 
directors, which, potentially could be any of the models I mentioned. It 
should merely be required to notify ICANN Board in a certain formal way 
when it has so determined to remove.


On 19/10/15 15:47, Jordan Carter wrote:
> IN all of our work on decisions internal to an SO or, we have taken a
> hands-off view - that the SO or AC itself should use the processes it uses.
>
> If we need to move off that, we should decide that ASAP. And tell the
> SOs/ACs.
>
> Jordan
>
> On 19 October 2015 at 15:27, Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 19/10/15 15:15, Chris Disspain wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The relevant SO/AC then makes a decision. Removal of the Director
>>> requires a 75% majority in the relevant SO/AC.
>>>
>>>
>> 75% of what?
>>
>> (a) All Council members?
>> (b) Council Members voting
>> (c) All SO Members?
>> (d) SO Members casting a vote
>>
>>
>> At least one of these would appear, in practice, to be unlikely in the
>> extreme to ever be triggered.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>
>