[CCWG-ACCT] AGENDA - Session on 21 Oct
Dr Eberhard W Lisse
el at lisse.NA
Wed Oct 21 13:14:15 UTC 2015
Dear Co-Chairs,
as opposed to our young participant some of us have meaningful
engagements. Many of which long scheduled in advanced.
Springing an agenda, AFTER THE FACT (2015-10-16, while we were already
in Dublin) on the members, begs the question why, which I, so far, have
not asked.
greetings, el
On 2015-10-21 13:51 , Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> Yes thats correct Greg and perhaps thats what the "older colleague" who
> is rightly a member by title failed to figure out. I plan to be there as
> well, although may be a little late due to other commitments.
>
> Regards
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com
> <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> This is for the meeting today, October 21 at 17:00. The calendar
> item was sent out on October 16, and I believe it was first
> announced somewhat earlier that week.
>
> I look forward to seeing you there.
>
> Greg
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Seun Ojedeji
> <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com <mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> The meeting seem to be consistent with what was earlier shared
> as the outcome of the meeting with SO/AC leadership prior to Dublin.
>
> Hence since the objection word seem to be a hobby now, I like to
> "object" to the objection made.
>
> Regards
>
> Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
>
> On 21 Oct 2015 11:37, "Nigel Roberts" <nigel at channelisles.net
> <mailto:nigel at channelisles.net>> wrote:
>
> I agree with Dr Lisse's objection to this meeting.
>
> I cordially and heartily disapprove of such failures to give
> notice (whether well-intentioned or otherwise, which is
> doubtful) which inevitably appear to lead to perceptions
> they are designed to reduce or eliminate the attendance of
> those who would be opposed to such deals as appears to be
> common knowledge may or may not have already been reached
> behind closed doors.
>
> It really IS Back to the Future Day today. And today is the
> day, I fear that we are going to repeat the events of 1998
> in how the IFWP ended in the unilateral creation of ICANN,
> just as I predicted some months back.
>
> What I could not have predicted is how ironic that this is
> done today.
>
>
> http://www.martymcflycountdown.com/
>
>
> On 21/10/15 07:04, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>
> I object and protest against springing meetings on the
> members without notice, that clash with others and have
> the effect of reducing participation.
>
> el
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> /Seun Ojedeji,
> Federal University Oye-Ekiti
> web: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
> Mobile: +2348035233535
> //alt email:<http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
> <mailto:seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>/
>
> Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your
> action!
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4218 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151021/3d2aae77/smime.p7s>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list