[CCWG-ACCT] On Stress Test 18

[Arun Mohan Sukumar]

Hi Finn, this is what I went by:
http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp1/2015-March/000071.html

If the Danish position has changed, happy to correct.

Best,

-- 
Head, Cyber Initiative
Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi
http://amsukumar.tumblr.com
+91-9871943272

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Finn Petersen <FinPet at erst.dk> wrote:

> Dear Arun,
>
> Thoughts - here is one!
>
> You write "Several countries, notably Brazil, Spain, Denmark and
> Argentina, see the proposed modification as unacceptable."
>
> Why did you include Denmark in the group of countries that oppose ST18  -
> your statement concerning Denmark is wrong!!!!
>
> Please correct this.
>
> Best,
>
> Finn, GAC - Dk
>
> Sendt fra min iPad
>
> Den 27. okt. 2015 kl. 17.42 skrev "arun.sukumar at orfonline.org" <
> arun.sukumar at orfonline.org>:
>
> CCWGers, plugging here a post I wrote on discussions around Stress Test
> 18.
>
> http://blogs.cfr.org/cyber/2015/10/27/governments-v-icann-the-last-battle-before-the-iana-transition/
>
> Thoughts welcome!
>
> Best,
> Arun
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> Head, Cyber Initiative
> Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi
> http://amsukumar.tumblr.com/
> Ph: +91-9871943272
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151027/3816c28e/attachment.html>