[CCWG-ACCT] On Stress Test 18

Arun Mohan Sukumar arun.sukumar at orfonline.org
Tue Oct 27 18:45:11 UTC 2015


>From Finn, circulated with permission:

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Finn Petersen <FinPet at erst.dk> wrote:

> Arun,
>
>
>
> The Danish position has not changed.
>
>
>
> In the email you attach we said “*From our (DK) point of view we fully
> understand the need to have a stress test for such a situation, including
> mitigating capture*, but it is our general view that any such proposal
> should not lower the current threshold for the obligation of the ICANN
> Board to duly taking into account GAC advice.”
>
>
>
> According to ST 18 the ICANN Board has only to try, in good faith and in a
> timely and efficient manner, to find a mutually acceptable solution, when
> GAC advice is supported by *consensus*. The ICANN Board has always to
> duly take account of GAC advice – also advices that are not supported by
> consensus in the GAC.
>
>
>
> Hope this helps? If you have further questions, do not hesitate to contact
> me. If you would like to know more about the Danish position on ST 18,
> please read the transcripts from the GAC meetings.
>
>
>
> Looking forward to the correction.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Finn
>
>
>
>
>
> *Fra:* Arun Mohan Sukumar [mailto:arun.sukumar at orfonline.org]
> *Sendt:* 27. oktober 2015 18:15
> *Til:* Finn Petersen
> *Cc:* Accountability Cross Community
> *Emne:* Re: [CCWG-ACCT] On Stress Test 18
>
>
>
> Hi Finn, this is what I went by:
> http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp1/2015-March/000071.html
>
>
>
> If the Danish position has changed, happy to correct.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
> --
>
> Head, Cyber Initiative
>
> Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi
>
> http://amsukumar.tumblr.com
>
> +91-9871943272
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Finn Petersen <FinPet at erst.dk> wrote:
>
> Dear Arun,
>
>
>
> Thoughts - here is one!
>
>
>
> You write "Several countries, notably Brazil, Spain, Denmark and
> Argentina, see the proposed modification as unacceptable."
>
>
>
> Why did you include Denmark in the group of countries that oppose ST18  -
> your statement concerning Denmark is wrong!!!!
>
>
>
> Please correct this.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Finn, GAC - Dk
>
> Sendt fra min iPad
>
>
> Den 27. okt. 2015 kl. 17.42 skrev "arun.sukumar at orfonline.org" <
> arun.sukumar at orfonline.org>:
>
> CCWGers, plugging here a post I wrote on discussions around Stress Test
> 18.
>
>
> http://blogs.cfr.org/cyber/2015/10/27/governments-v-icann-the-last-battle-before-the-iana-transition/
>
>
>
> Thoughts welcome!
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Arun
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>
>
> Head, Cyber Initiative
>
> Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi
>
> http://amsukumar.tumblr.com/
>
> Ph: +91-9871943272
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151028/6be33f78/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list