[CCWG-ACCT] Pls Read - Agenda for Meeting - WP1 on Fri 30 October at 18h UTC

Jordan Carter jordan at internetnz.net.nz
Fri Oct 30 08:44:28 UTC 2015


Dear Kavouss

The wp1 meeting is a chance to discuss these in detail and to advise the
ccwg whether to continue with the direction set out in Dublin, or the
direction set out in the second draft proposal, or a new direction.

The outcome of the meeting is to answer clearly the questions in the agenda
email.

Best
Jordan

On Friday, 30 October 2015, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Jor dan,
> We have seen and read this materials many times.
> What is the next pls
> Kavouss
>
>
> 2015-10-30 5:06 GMT+01:00 Jordan Carter <jordan at internetnz.net.nz
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jordan at internetnz.net.nz');>>:
>
>> As ever, all of you are welcome to join the call in around 14 hours.
>>
>> best
>> Jordan
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Jordan Carter <jordan at internetnz.net.nz
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jordan at internetnz.net.nz');>>
>> Date: 30 October 2015 at 17:06
>> Subject: Pls Read - Agenda for Meeting - WP1 on Fri 30 October at 18h UTC
>> To: "wp1 at icann.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wp1 at icann.org');>" <
>> wp1 at icann.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wp1 at icann.org');>>
>>
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> Our call is on Friday from 18h UTC, and may last up to two hours.
>>
>> The proposed agenda items are as follows. *PLEASE READ THIS AGENDA
>> CAREFULLY* as it sets out how I propose we run the meeting and the
>> questions I propose we aim to answer.
>>
>> *1. Review of Agenda*
>>
>> *2. Decision-making in the Community Mechanism*
>> *This agenda item should look at decision-making, and seeing where the WP
>> sits with key issues raised in the "Dublin Approach".*
>>
>> *To prepare for this item I suggest reading the following papers:*
>> *- Community Decision-Making: The Dublin Approach Working Paper*
>> *- Public Comment Analysis - Voting in the community mechanism*
>>
>> *If you have time, also have a look at the staff analysis of public
>> comments - the "Model" and "Voting-Forum" tabs in particular.*
>>
>> *Papers attached or linked below. I have not updated the Dublin Approach
>> paper, but kept the very valuable comments, and moved Robin's added issues
>> into separate rows in the Issues Table.*
>>
>> *My suggestion is that we deal with the following specific questions, as
>> they are the key changes in the model compared with what we presented in
>> the Second Draft Proposal. We should for each question identify whether we
>> have a consensus on them or whether we don't -- so we can advise the full
>> CCWG of WP1's views.*
>>
>> *a) Do we support the decision-making model (by consensus) replacing the
>> voting approach?*
>>
>> *b) Do we support only one view being expressed by each SO or AC?*
>>
>> *c) Do we support an equal say for each participating SO or AC?*
>>
>>
>> *We also need to address the following:*
>>
>> *d) In our Third Draft Proposal, which SOs and ACs do we propose should
>> be participating? that is, do we respect the SSAC's desire not to, and do
>> we take a view re RSSAC?*
>>
>> *e) Based on our answer to d), do we need to make any changes to the
>> numbers in the decision-making framework?*
>>
>>
>>
>> *3. Other Work Required by WP1*
>> *I do not have a current list of work we need to do in the next fortnight
>> but believe this will be clearer following next week's CCWG. I welcome
>> staff or co-chairs' input on this at this point of the WP1 agenda, and of
>> course suggestions from WP1 participants.*
>>
>>
>> *4. Any Other Business*
>>
>>
>>
>> *Papers*
>>
>> I attach PDFs of the Dublin Approach paper and of the Public Comment
>> report section on voting.
>>
>> The Dublin paper Google Doc is at: <
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zHZl_NvQ1WChatX8NT2Q1rQi4zQZgbrbAxrQSsH3tZQ/edit
>> >
>>
>> The full WP1 Public Comment is at: <
>> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/56142506/2015-10-12-CCWG-WP1-SecondPC-FullAnalysis.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1444644438000&api=v2
>> >
>>
>> You may also find the staff analysis of Public Comments useful, which
>> deals with voting specifically in a couple of the tabs (Model and
>> Voting-Forum): <
>> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/54693137/PC2%20tool%20-%2024%20SeptBTv2.xlsx?version=1&modificationDate=1443208173000&api=v2
>> >
>>
>> cheers
>> Jordan
>>
>> --
>> Jordan Carter
>>
>> Chief Executive
>> *InternetNZ*
>>
>> +64-4-495-2118 (office) | +64-21-442-649 (mob)
>> Email: jordan at internetnz.net.nz
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jordan at internetnz.net.nz');>
>> Skype: jordancarter
>> Web: www.internetnz.nz
>>
>> *A better world through a better Internet *
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jordan Carter
>>
>> Chief Executive
>> *InternetNZ*
>>
>> +64-4-495-2118 (office) | +64-21-442-649 (mob)
>> Email: jordan at internetnz.net.nz
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jordan at internetnz.net.nz');>
>> Skype: jordancarter
>> Web: www.internetnz.nz
>>
>> *A better world through a better Internet *
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org');>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>>
>

-- 
Jordan Carter
Chief Executive, InternetNZ

+64-21-442-649 | jordan at internetnz.net.nz

Sent on the run, apologies for brevity
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151030/1b5b1abc/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list