[CCWG-ACCT] Transparency recap (Was: Contribution on Transparency Reforms for CCWG)
Nigel Roberts
nigel at channelisles.net
Fri Oct 30 14:40:30 UTC 2015
You mean just like you agreed with the identified consensus on a
Membership model.
So, to follow the ALAC example, there's no reason why, even if was the
case that it was a WS2 (which I doubt), it has to remain so.
On 30/10/15 14:17, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> Transparency is needed, but the CCWG identified this as a WS2 issue.
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list