[CCWG-ACCT] Perhaps a variation...

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Wed Sep 2 10:49:05 UTC 2015


Dear Alan,
I wholeheartedly support Jordan
We can not reconsider what we were about to finalize from our Paris Meeting
and start a new round of discussion just 10 days before the expiry of
Deadline.
I do not think that what Alan proposed is simpler as there is bnot clear
criteria to examine its simplicity.
I am not in favor of the continuation of the discussion in this regard.
As Keith Drazak told in Chat, CMSM is a compromise even if I did not agree
to use the term "compromise "as it is the only way that all six?Seven
powers could be exercised by the community
Legal Advisers have comprehensively described the problem of Designator,
unless it is accompanied by the UA approach that we have totally abandoned
Regards
Kavouss

2015-09-02 12:17 GMT+02:00 Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net>:

>
>
> On 02/09/2015 03:26, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> > So, although I am hesitant to suggest we switch gears at this time, I am
> > not sure we have a real alternative if we want to effect the transition.
> >
> > The At-Large group was very supportive of considering a variation of
> > what we now have, specifically, a Community Mechanism as a Sole
> > Designator (CMSD).
>
> Trying to revive a Designator Model, or any other model that cannot
> provide enforceability[*], is hardly the way to achieve support for
> transition. While I understand that you don't think enforceability is
> important, you surely must realise by now that it is considered
> essential by many.
>
> Even if you succeeded in pushing CCWG into this change, all you would
> achieve would be to convince a sizable chunk of the community to
> campaign against transition.
>
> Have you communicated to your colleagues in ALAC that you say were
> enthused by this supposed alternative that it would just provoke
> opposition to transition altogether? Or are they under the impression
> that this is something that is likely to win a broad consensus?
>
> Malcolm.
>
> [*] I'm simplifying slightly by mentioning only enforceability: having a
> Member also changes how the fiduciary duty works, which is also
> crucially important. Becky explained this much more articulately than I
> can.
>
> --
>             Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
>    Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
>  London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/
>
>                  London Internet Exchange Ltd
>            21-27 St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RY
>
>          Company Registered in England No. 3137929
>        Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150902/b995ca61/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list