[CCWG-ACCT] Chris's summary of current thinking

Malcolm Hutty malcolm at linx.net
Thu Sep 3 09:02:38 UTC 2015


I regret that I was unable to make the Board call last night. I hope a
recording and, ideally, transcript, will be made available soon.

On 02/09/2015 23:47, Jordan Carter wrote:
> 2.      IRP Enhancements
> 
> a.      Roll back modification of standard of review that was in place
> before 2013.
> 
> b.      Commitment that revised standard of review, standing panel and
> procedural improvements will be part of next phase of work on IRP
> enhancements.

> [NOT MY AREA]

I would read this as

"* Reject CCWG proposals for IRP reforms
* Promise to come back to look at reforms to IRP after transition"

Is that reading correct?

If so, I would be very disappointed. This was identified from the start
as THE core WS1 issue.

If the Board is saying that the principles as to how the compatibility
of their actions with the bylaws is adjudicated, to what standard, by
whom, and whom can complain and thereby initiate such review, to say
that all that should be left to WS2 is not something I can support.


-- 
            Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
   Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
 London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/

                 London Internet Exchange Ltd
           21-27 St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RY

         Company Registered in England No. 3137929
       Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA





More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list