[CCWG-ACCT] Regarding the Board's Comments and It's Obligations

[Chris Disspain]

Hi Greg,

> We can choose to treat the Board's intervention as "participation," but it did not have the feeling of participation to me. 

So what would participation look like to you?


Cheers,

Chris

> On 9 Sep 2015, at 05:52 , Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Did anyone get the license plate number of the bus that "participated" with me?
> 
> We can choose to treat the Board's intervention as "participation," but it did not have the feeling of participation to me.  It had the feeling of the Board attempting to exercise its position of power.
> 
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com <mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Even though I would have preferred seeing board's comment earlier than now. I believe what is written below is still order. I quote a section below that may need to be in bold as well.
> 
> "....if we have views on that proposal, we should participate with the community."
> 
> We are still in proposal development process and board is participating in the process.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
> 
> On 8 Sep 2015 19:58, "Paul Rosenzweig" <paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com <mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com>> wrote:
> All
> 
>  
> 
> In preparation for our call today, I wanted to share with you the following that I pulled from the hearing that the Senate Commerce Committee held earlier this year:
> 
> ***
> 
>  
> 
> The Chairman:  Will the ICANN Board send a proposal to NTIA that lessens the Board’s power or authority?
> 
> Mr. Chehade:  We will if the community and the stakeholders present us with a proposal.  We will give it to NTIA, and we committed already that we will not change the proposal, that if we have views on that proposal, we should participate with the community. Once that proposal comes from our stakeholders, we will pass it on to NTIA as is.
> 
> ***
> 
> I would read this as a commitment from ICANN and the Board.
> 
> Paul
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Paul Rosenzweig
> 
> Red Branch Consulting, PLLC
> 
> 509 C St. NE
> 
> Washington, DC 20002
> 
> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com <mailto:paul.rosenzweigesq at redbranchconsulting.com>
> O: +1 (202) 547-0660 <tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20547-0660>
> M: +1 (202) 329-9650 <tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20329-9650>
> VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739 <tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20738-1739>
> Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
> 
> www.redbranchconsulting.com <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/>
> www.paulrosenzweigesq.com <http://www.paulrosenzweigesq.com/>
> Link to my PGP Key <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19&Itemid=9>
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150909/7312caf7/attachment.html>