[CCWG-ACCT] Blog: Working Together Through The Last Mile

[Chris Disspain]

:-)

Thanks El.

> Deliver a well thought-out, well structured paper with small, digestable chunks that the CCWG can easily work of off top to bottom well prior to the F2F, as in, like, yesterday…

That is what the Board is currently working on. 

> Have the meeting itself chaired by the CCWG and the agenda agreed upon well in advance.

There does seem to be a fair amount of misunderstanding about this. All the Board has done is to suggest that the CCWG hold a face to face before Dublin. It was not intended to be some sort of special meeting with the Board where there would be negotiation. 

If the CCWG agrees to have the meeting then a) a venue is available on the dates suggested in LA and b) having it at that time in LA would mean that the majority of there board would be able to be there because our retreat is on the 26th, 27th and 28th September. 

So were such a meeting to take place it would be chaired and run by the CCWG with its own agenda etc. 



Cheers,

Chris

> On 9 Sep 2015, at 08:40 , Dr Eberhard W Lisse <epilisse at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Chris,
> 
> Though I am hardly speaking for the CCWG, I personally would find the below helpful:
> 
> Deliver a well thought-out, well structured paper with small, digestable chunks that the CCWG can easily work of off top to bottom well prior to the F2F, as in, like, yesterday...
> 
> Have the meeting itself chaired by the CCWG and the agenda agreed upon well in advance.
> 
> Scribe the meeting in real-time locally and remotely and make the transcripts public as a matter of urgency.
> 
> Have real-time audio and video streams running.
> 
> Accept whatever the CCWG comes up with (even if I don't :-)-O)
> 
> And as a personal favor, whether I myself make it there or not, keep that Chehade waffler out of the building.
> 
> greetings, el
> 
> --
> Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 6
> 
> On Sep 8, 2015, 23:45 +0200, Chris Disspain <ceo at auda.org.au <mailto:ceo at auda.org.au>>, wrote:
>> All,
>> 
>> I think Roelof makes some good points but then I would wouldn’t I.  I have been speaking to a number of CCWG folks to try to at least bridge the gap between the perceptions of the Board and the perceptions of the CCWG. If anyone has any ideas how we can do more of that I think it would be most helpful.
>> 
>> I note for example Greg’s email on response to Roelof about participation. I’m clear that the Board is participating and not intervening. What would help to delver that message to the CCWG?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Chris
>> [...]
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150909/c6d7961c/attachment.html>