[CCWG-ACCT] Regarding the Board's Comments and It's Obligations

[Chris Disspain]

Thanks  Avri.

That may well be a useful way of looking at. I’ll ponder during my meetings today and get back toy as soon as I can with my thoughts.


Cheers,

Chris

> On 9 Sep 2015, at 09:07 , Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Not sure about buses, but I agree with the rest.  Given the Board's role
> in the finalization of the Accountability WS1 plan, they are not, and
> cannot be considered, ordinary participants in this process.
> 
> I think the Board members have three modes of interaction, at least:
> 
> - as individual participants who voices are as important as any other
> individual voice, but whose opinions give us a clue as to what the Board
> might do.
> - as liaisons
> - as members of the Board, where they have the power to mark our
> recommendations with grades indicating their degree of acceptance. It is
> the Board that is the gate on moving forward with any plan for ICANN
> Accountabilty. These are the folks we had the Thursday meeting with.
> 
> I very much hope we can find a way to share making the decision on the
> plan to be submitted to NTIA, because I think it is the only option at
> this multistakeholder juncture.
> 
> avri
> 
> On 08-Sep-15 15:52, Greg Shatan wrote:
>> Did anyone get the license plate number of the bus that "participated"
>> with me?
>> 
>> We can choose to treat the Board's intervention as "participation,"
>> but it did not have the feeling of participation to me.  It had the
>> feeling of the Board attempting to exercise its position of power.
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
>> <mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>    Hi,
>> 
>>    Even though I would have preferred seeing board's comment earlier
>>    than now. I believe what is written below is still order. I quote
>>    a section below that may need to be in bold as well.
>> 
>>    "....if we have views on that proposal, we should participate with
>>    the community."
>> 
>>    We are still in proposal development process and board is
>>    participating in the process.
>> 
>>    Regards
>> 
>>    Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
>>    Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
>> 
>>    On 8 Sep 2015 19:58, "Paul Rosenzweig"
>>    <paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
>>    <mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>        All
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>        In preparation for our call today, I wanted to share with you
>>        the following that I pulled from the hearing that the Senate
>>        Commerce Committee held earlier this year:
>> 
>>        ***
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>        The Chairman:  Will the ICANN Board send a proposal to NTIA
>>        that lessens the Board’s power or authority?
>> 
>>        Mr. Chehade:  We will if the community and the stakeholders
>>        present us with a proposal.  We will give it to NTIA, and we
>>        committed already that we will not change the proposal, that
>>        if we have views on that proposal, we should participate with
>>        the community. Once that proposal comes from our stakeholders,
>>        we will pass it on to NTIA *as is*.
>> 
>>        ***
>> 
>>        I would read this as a commitment from ICANN and the Board.
>> 
>>        Paul
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>        Paul Rosenzweig
>> 
>>        Red Branch Consulting, PLLC
>> 
>>        509 C St. NE
>> 
>>        Washington, DC 20002
>> 
>>        paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
>>        <mailto:paul.rosenzweigesq at redbranchconsulting.com>
>> 
>>        O: +1 (202) 547-0660 <tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20547-0660>
>> 
>>        M: +1 (202) 329-9650 <tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20329-9650>
>> 
>>        VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739 <tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20738-1739>
>> 
>>        Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
>> 
>>        www.redbranchconsulting.com <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/>
>> 
>>        www.paulrosenzweigesq.com <http://www.paulrosenzweigesq.com/>
>> 
>>        Link to my PGP Key
>>        <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19&Itemid=9>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>        _______________________________________________
>>        Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>        Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>        <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>>        https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> 
>> 
>>    _______________________________________________
>>    Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>    Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>    <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>>    https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150909/2dd6e364/attachment.html>