[CCWG-ACCT] Board comments now in

[Chris Disspain]

Hi Jordan,

> would they have legal standing as individuals? Or as an unincorporated association, that is, collectively?

Yes…either.

> has the board analysed whether the model is viable without a membership approach given the obligations directors hold (fiduciary obligations) in a non-membership system?

Not sure I understand the question. Yes, the mechanism is viable without a membership approach but could you clarify what you mean regarding the obligations?


Cheers,

Chris

> On 13 Sep 2015, at 12:31 , Jordan Carter <jordan at internetnz.net.nz> wrote:
> 
> So Bruce - would they have legal standing as individuals? Or as an unincorporated association, that is, collectively?
> 
> Relatedly - has the board analysed whether the model is viable without a membership approach given the obligations directors hold (fiduciary obligations) in a non-membership system?
> 
> J
> 
> On Sunday, 13 September 2015, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au <mailto:Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>> wrote:
> Hello Malcolm,
> 
> >>  Binding Enforcement: In California, final decisions may be turned into enforceable court judgments. So an arbitration decision issued following an MEM proceeding can be enforced in a court in California. "
> 
> >>  My first question is "By whom?"  
> 
> As per FAQ question no. 13, the answer is The MEM Issue Group.
> 
> This MEM Issue Group could be comprised of the individual people serving as chairs of the participating SOs/ACs. These individuals would have legal standing to initiate arbitration and have legal standing to enforce the outcome of the arbitration in court.
> 
> ICANN will indemnify the MEM Issue Group, and will bear the fees and expenses that might be incurred in any lawsuit arising out of the enforcement of a MEM final arbitration decision.
> 
> There are other options - but this seems to be the simplest.  More elaborate options include forming an unincorporated association for the purpose of initiating the arbitration and then seeking to enforce in court if necessary  (which I hope is never necessary - as any Board that I have been on would abide by the arbitration).
> 
> I have attached the relevant docs for ease of reference.
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jordan Carter
> Chief Executive, InternetNZ
> +64-21-442-649 | jordan at internetnz.net.nz <mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz>
> Sent on the run, apologies for brevity
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150913/28c2d5df/attachment.html>