[CCWG-ACCT] Your public comment re replacement of IANA provider

[Seun Ojedeji]

Hi Nigel,

I don't think we should conclude that way, i think we should maintain an
open mind, ask questions and with the appropriate response try re-evaluate
the proposal. I for instance like the idea that the MEM has the opportunity
to say that "we are happy with board's decision not to follow the
recommendation of the IRP" My question however is what happens when the MEM
says "we support the IRP's verdict and like the board to implement it"?

Regards

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net>
wrote:

> Becky is on the money, as is nearly often most always the case.
>
> Shouldn't we just conclude that MEM is fatally flawed, and (at best) is
> the result of muddled thinking by its proponents, say so clearly, so we can
> get on with something productive, like, oh, I don't know, counting sheep?
>
>
>
> On 18/09/15 15:57, Burr, Becky wrote:
>
>> Furthermore, and more worrisome to me is what the MEM does to the
>> fundamental concept of an independent judiciary.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------





*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
<http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email:
<http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
<seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*

Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your action!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150918/76617566/attachment.html>