[CCWG-ACCT] Your public comment re replacement of IANA provider

Dr Eberhard W Lisse epilisse at gmail.com
Sun Sep 20 06:26:03 UTC 2015


Bruce,

the way I understand it ICANN was uncooperative with the panel and then complied with the outcome of the IRP.

el

-- 
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini

> On 20 Sep 2015, at 01:37, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
> 
> Hello Eberhard,
> 
> 
>>> in the .AFRICA case at least (and I don't remember the older ones well) ICANN was not the model for cooperation, was it now? 
> 
> Well as I understand it - the two sides put forward their case, and the complainant won the case.
> 
> The ICANN Board then complied with the outcome of the IRP.
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community



More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list