[CCWG-ACCT] Your public comment re replacement of IANA provider
Dr Eberhard W Lisse
epilisse at gmail.com
Sun Sep 20 06:26:03 UTC 2015
Bruce,
the way I understand it ICANN was uncooperative with the panel and then complied with the outcome of the IRP.
el
--
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
> On 20 Sep 2015, at 01:37, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
>
> Hello Eberhard,
>
>
>>> in the .AFRICA case at least (and I don't remember the older ones well) ICANN was not the model for cooperation, was it now?
>
> Well as I understand it - the two sides put forward their case, and the complainant won the case.
>
> The ICANN Board then complied with the outcome of the IRP.
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list